Following is my talk I presented at the Brown University Physics department's event "For The Love of Physics", part of the Physics Fundamentals series.

1. Presentation:

As a kid I shared a room with my sibling who had monopoly over it, and whose untypical sense for the interior design resulted in walls covered with posters, not of the superstars but real stars, galaxies, and nebulas. We both spent countless hours staring at those walls that transfigured into the infinite unknown worlds, and we both wondered the exact same questions “What in the world is all of this around us?” We both pursued this question and while my sibling’s life is devoted to physics, while mine to art. In the lab full of metal and liquid helium, my sibling sets up experiments to test the question and confirm the answers, while I, in a studio filled with carbon (pencils) and paper, set up an Art process to experience the questions and understand the answers. Both Art and Science question the world; they bring new thoughts to the world, and re-contextualize preconceived ideas and views.

 

To illustrate this I will read the following quote by Carlo Rovelli.

“[Artistic] thinking explores and redraws the world, gradually offering us better and better images of it, teaching us to think in ever more effective ways. [Art] is a continual exploration of ways of thinking. Its strength is its visionary capacity to demolish preconceived ideas, to reveal new regions of reality, and to construct new and more effective images of the world. This adventure rests upon the entirety of past knowledge, but at its heart is change.” 

Carlo Rovelli being the theoretical physicist did not talk about Art but science, I just replaced the word science with Art. We can see that the same statement is the most accurate definition of both disciplines.

 

Erwin Schrodinger writes in What is Life? that we have inherited, throughout centuries, the unified, universal, all-embracing knowledge, which is the only one with full credit, however, the depth of knowledge has forced us to branch into specialized limited and narrow focus.  Perhaps we should have more comprehensive view of Reality.

 

Patrick Cavanagh, a co-founded the Vision Sciences Lab at Harvard, and leader in research in visual neuroscience and perception, recognizes that Art is a 40,000-year record of experiments in visual neuroscience that reveals as much about the human brain as it reveals about the world around.

 

Roberto Zenith, researcher in fluid dynamics and Professor of Engineering at Brown University, have extensively studied David A. Siqueiros and Jackson Pollock’s painting process realizing similarities between the paint technique to flow phenomena in other areas, which have helped explain formation of lava domes on Venus, and the Great Kavir salt desert in Iran. 

 

Type of Art that best encompasses these ideas of all-embracing knowledge is, what I call Information Realism. IR is art that through its processes, through the relations between informational units most accurately captures information from Reality, detached from artist’s beliefs, opinions, and expressions, but captures information from Reality verbatim.

Artist, just like scientists with the experiment, sets up an art process that allows a phenomenon to be documented by the phenomenon itself.  

 

Examples of Information Realism:

El Castillo cave in Spain contains handprints about 40,000 years old. We have direct information of the person’s physicality and actions who 40,000 years ago was present in the cave. The information of their existence at the moment, in the moment, is permanently preserved. This is one of the very first IR. 

 

Similarly, Roman Ondák’s Measuring the Universe begins with an empty gallery space. Gallery attendants mark, with a marker, height, name and date of each visitor who enters the space. Every name, even if invisible, has permanently defined the current state of the space while existing within the space only for a brief moment, just like the cave handprints. Randomness of the individual height marks has over time accumulated into a wave pattern. 

  

Dada, a nonsensical, art movement, developed in reaction to World War I, in 1916,  in Zürich, Switzerland. In the time of WW1 the entire world was using the most rational reasons, according to them, for justifying behaviors that were the most irrational and ill conceived. The world made no sense and the most realistic representation would be nonsensical art and irrationality, 

Interestingly enough, around the same time Max Planck, Niels Bohr, Louis de Broglie, Paul Dirac, Werner Heisenberg, Wolfgang Pauli, Erwin Schrödinger, to name only a few of the great thinkers, were working on Quantum theory. Quantum Theory, like DADA, at the same time period, seemed not to make sense at first and required a high level of abstract thinking, knowledge, and intellect in order to be understood.

 

Cornelia Parker’s works are literal objects, and their remains, that have undergone a dramatic event of a destruction, making them a documentation of an event frozen in time.

 

Charles Ross’s consists of burned wooden planks by concentrating sunlight with a lens. It took 8 minutes and 33 seconds for the photons to travel from the surface of the Sun to Earth and burn the wood. The Sun is drawing a portrait of itself. Observation of the phenomenon documented by the phenomenon itself.

 

Rachel Whiteread makes us aware of things-in-the-world that we experience and are part of, yet are rarely, if ever, consciously aware of. By pouring the concrete inside a building and then tearing down the walls, she makes air and even more importantly space itself, solid. Space is the main component on the micro and macro level. We would be the size of a dust particle if we were to take all the space out of us.

 

William Anastasi would hold a pencil, one in each hand, paper on the lap, and close eyes while taking a ride on the subway train. The movement and vibration of the train would move pencils across the paper creating the Subway Drawings. The realistic representation of the phenomenon’s information, in this case a train ride, is documented by the phenomenon itself. 

 

Man Ray’s The Gift, 1921, The object’s intended function is reversed into its opposite. Reconstructing Reality makes us aware of Reality. 

 

Personal IR studies:

 

Mark-in-time

What is time? How do I understand living through time, within time? Well, I marked every minute in a year. Paper is field with 1440 marks daily, number of minutes in 24 hours. 365 pieces of paper in total, one for each day in a year. Colored-in is the number of awake minutes daily.

 

Indeterminism

After completing 100 drawings of flowers, 10 x 10 in. Each drawing is cut into 1 x 1 cm squares, totaling 40,000. Cut pieces are randomly reassembled back onto one hundred 10 x 10 in. Pieces. For 40,000 factorial is a staggering number of possible random combinations and this is one of the possible outcomes. 

Would randomness create wave patterns and clumps of more and less material, would it be even, or not random at all? 

 

What is 1,000,000? I did not understand it, so I made a million bricks.

 

Universe, is a mosaicked installation consisting of hundreds of the small textured liquid charcoal drawings. The invisible water that controls the textures dictates where the charcoal will be more concentrated or absent, similarly to the Dark energy and Dark matter clumping the matter within the universe.

 

The book of all, consists of 10,000 drawings of plants, stones, animals, and places.

The book is a collection of perceptions, of the world, of being in the world.

 

Currently all that is known in the Universe, everything we can account for is only about 4% of the mass and energy of the Universe. I wanted to understand how much we know we don’t know.

Book of Knowledge, consists of 1,000 pages, where 40 pages in total are filled with bit marks, around 500,000.

How much is there that we don’t know that we don’t know.

 

How to understand the involuntary actions within the body that keep us alive?

I drew 100,000 watercolor marks in the book, the size of the average heart, as the human heart beats about 100,000 times in a day.

 

Self portrait of them

Understanding myself by being aware of every day that my parents lived.  Each side of the glass contains a number of marks equal to the number of days that my mom has been alive, and the other side my dad at the time of the drawings collision. 24,622 ; 26,889

 

1 mile drawing of self portraits, is the longest drawing in the world, unofficially.

The piece is installed on the film reels and the viewer can observe only a few feet at the time as they rewind the reels. 

All portraits, thousands, ARE simultaneously in the superposition existence, that the observer collapses into one state, one impression of a character at the time, by interacting with it (turning the wheel. Our perceptual cognition has not yet evolved into complex enough consciousness to be able to comprehend the whole mile of portraits. Until that happens we must do the hard work of rewinding the reel in order to perceive. 

 

Self Limitation, Circle, 40 hr. piece

 

1 line extended, 30 hr.

A continuous line is drawn for 30 incessant hours.

Through the focused durational activity self becomes an observer and observed, simultaneously; one who is experiencing and one who is observing the experiencing self. How much can one extend oneself in 30 hr.?

 

How do we determine the value of an Art piece? 

By applying Physics and information theory, of course. 

I proposed that the value of Art is simply determined by the information that it carries.

The Ancient Greeks suggested that the information content of an event depends only on how probable this event really is.  Aristotle argued that the more surprised we are by an event the more information the event carries. This means that information is inversely proportional to probability, meaning events with smaller probability carry more information, and more information more value the art piece has. Let's say realistic painting of a regular cat, not Schrödinger’s, (no mystery if it is dead or alive but a nice fluffy cat) the piece is probable;

How much information does the painting contain, not much if any, because it is a cat, we all agree, and there are no other interpretations. It is certain that we all see the can, no more, so there is no value to it. It is a predictable aesthetic, without offering us new ways of seeing it. The painting is an artist’s impression of the superficial appearances of the agree upon reality, therefore.

In contrast, concrete space, exploding shed, or the iron with the nails, are unexpected pieces. They are complex pieces, containing different meaning for every viewer. The information level is   high, meaning it is a high value Art. 

This view I adopt from Vlatko Vedral, Professor of Quantum Information Theory at the University of Oxford, and Claude Shannon an engineer and "the father of information theory". After all, physicists and engineers are artists who are very good at math.

 

Interview with Evanston Art Center Exhibiting Artist: Jelena Berenc

Can you explain your artistic process and how your identity as an Informational Realist ties into your work? 

Possessing consciousness and awareness of the Self and the world is a miracle that should not be taken for granted. We owe to our consciousness, to our humanity, to wonder and inquire about the reality in which we are. By inquiring we justify our conscious existence. My personal necessity for understanding and comprehending the Reality is manifested through the inclination for the direct experiences. What I mean is that in order to understand a particular subject, fact, or truth I must experience it through the activity of drawing, I must directly experience and Be that which is to be understood. While scientist, perhaps, make others experience that which is to be observed through experiments, I as an Artist am my own experiment and a passive observer of the experiencing experience. This is a reason why I am an Artist; because I must inquire about the world around and in order to comprehend the particular fact about the reality I must experience the given information through drawing process. The random repetition of excessive mark making on a blank paper is perhaps just like Information Theory or Quantum Mechanics explains the most fundamental workings of the Universe. All the possible possibilities Are there on the blank paper and by adding the random marks, information, the randomness becomes deterministic, representational. However, this representation becomes specific only for a viewer when observed depending on how it is observed.

What would you say has been your biggest hurdle as an artist, and how did that experience affect you as an artist? 

Not having a studio but working on a dining table or a desk has certainly affected my practical choices of how to execute a large format pieces. Being an introvert and not so socially ambitious can present itself as a challenge when trying to promote your work and get shows. However, even though this isolation results in not as advanced career, it does leave you with very personal work, work truthful to yourself, liberated from need to appeal. 

How has the pandemic impacted your art process? 

The pandemic has not change my art process at all. My daily obligations and jobs are just as same as before pandemic, and I still work from late evening hours till few hours after the midnight. As an introvert even psychologically and emotionally the isolation was not new nor out of ordinary.

What piece are you most looking forward to displaying at the Evanston Art Center and why? 

Mark-in-timeUnknown of the Known and Reality are the pieces recently completed and I did not see them installed yet. When I work on the large format piece I only see a part of it at the time. Prior to the installation, I usually only imagine how the piece looks like as a whole. This works quite well considering that process has priority in my art practice but it is certainly nice to see it as a finish piece and comprehend the size of it.

NEW EXHIBITION

Evanston Art Center

ON VIEW: October 3 - November 8, 2020

Meet the Artist: Sunday, October 4, 2020
Exhibiting artists include Jelena Berenc, Chris Hyndman, Carlos Melian & Hiromi Tanaka.

Evanston Art Center, 1717 Central Street , Evanston, IL 60201 

View Map

https://www.evanstonartcenter.org/exhibitions/jelena-berenc

Interview with Evanston Art Center Exhibiting: Concentrics, Fall Edition 2020

https://www.evanstonartcenter.org/blog/concentrics-fall-edition-2020-jelena-berenc

Meet the Artists:

https://www.eventbrite.com/e/meet-the-artist-jelena-berenc-chris-hyndman-carlos-melian-hiromi-tanaka-tickets-120068651569

Random Thought

If we are to observe the life through classical laws, surprisingly to me, in life, it is not about the time not wasted, but to what degree we curve the space around us that matters.

Reflections on Art and Art Education

If we are to reflect upon the most fundamental ways of nature, a theory that explains all, which I believe is Quantum Information Theory, than all there is must behave as such. If the world works according to fixed or given laws and the human mind is part of that world than any human can understand the world. Artist, the art piece, and its creation is ruled by the same fixed laws. Any art piece is just a possibility. As soon as a mark is made, an art piece Is and Is not; the process is and is not; it is completed and it is not; it exist and it does not; simultaneously. The art piece is in the superposition. Observing the art piece creates a certain outcome for the observer. Each observer holds her own reality and every time observer makes an observation a new certain reality is created (maybe this is a reason why many think art is subjective). Does this mean that the art piece is a photon emitter, like in a double slit experiment, and observers are perceiving just one of infinite possibilities.  If artist is an information creator to begin with, than in what state is the artist in? Is the artist in quantum superposition as well or out-of-the-system observer?

If we are to reason this way shouldn’t we completely reform the way we critique art? Shouldn’t we teach our students to observe, create, and critique art according to these fundamental laws?

Reflections on Art and Science

Scientists want to perceive and understand. They need proof for their perceptions. Artists want to experience and Be that which is experienced. Artist goes through the experience, while scientist make others experience that which is to be observed. Artist is her own experiment and a passive observer of the experiencing experience. Do we understand more successfully when just observing or perhaps when experiencing? Perhaps a true knowledge of nature is better understood by Artist rather than scientist, I would argue. 

Reflections On Humanity

It is a human responsibility to seek understanding and nature of things. 

If only people were more concerned with nature of reality, maybe, just maybe, we would develop our collective consciousness instead of collective stupidity.